The definition of "hero" are various and it should be different from people, but Thackeray calls this book a novel without a hero. In my opionion, in this book he defined "hero" as a peroson not only who is very kind and brave but also who can be honest for him or herself.
(So, I think even Dobbin who are gentle and contributes to his country cannot be a hero. )
How do you think about "hero" in Vanity Fair??
In himself, I think Dobbin has all the qualities necessary to be a hero, including being honest with himself. It might spoil the story a bit if I say why he can't be considered a hero, but I think it is completely intentional on Thackeray's part to give him all the qualities normally required of a hero.
ReplyDeleteI don't know why the author wrote the story without a hero, but I agree about what a "hero" is. It is difficult to be a hero wiht being honest. Even Spider-Man is sceard and wanted to escape, he must help people, isnt'it??
ReplyDeleteI really agree with you! I think this is no correct answer about hero!
DeleteI think, Thackeray defines the word "hero" as a person who achieves his goal by being honest to his mind besides being brave and kind. I don't think Dobbin is satisfied with marridge of Amelia.
ReplyDeleteI think your idea is really interesting and I could make out that's why Dobbin is not a hero! Thank you:)
DeleteYes, that's getting close!
ReplyDelete